分類 sos求救問題

大部分人打開安心守護，只會在「開車」或「去約會」時才按下守護模式。但同一套守護系統，其實可以對應更多真實新聞裡出現的情境：夜跑昏倒、面交變成搶劫或綁架、酒醉搭車被載去偏僻地方、就在警局門口卻三天都沒人發現、被關在前任住處卻沒有任何系統替你發出訊號。這篇文章用具體案例，帶你看車禍守護、約會守護、安心守護、反向守護，怎麼在生活裡「疊成四重守護」。

Most people only turn on Accident Guard when they drive, or use Date Guard only for dates. In reality, SafeGuard’s Guard system can be matched to many real-life situations: collapsing on a night run, in-person trades that turn violent, drunk taxi rides that go off route, or being trapped in a dangerous place. This article walks through these cases and shows how Accident Guard, Date Guard, the core SafeGuard mode and Reverse Guard can work together as four layers of protection.

On Black Friday, a shooting at California’s Westfield Valley Fair mall sent crowds running and hiding behind locked shop gates. This article doesn’t teach “how to press SOS” — it explains why, in real emergencies, people rarely have the ability to operate their phones, and why we need systems that can automatically alert trusted contacts when we can’t.

Black Friday 當天，加州 Westfield Valley Fair 商場發生槍擊，現場民眾一邊逃命、一邊躲進店裡封門。這篇文章想談的不是「怎麼按 SOS」，而是殘酷現實：逃跑時沒人有空開功能，中彈後更不可能操作手機，因此真正需要的是在人失能之後也能自動發出求救訊號的機制。

Many people assume that turning on location sharing automatically increases safety, but in reality location sharing safety is far more complex. This article explains how constant tracking can become a tool of control and abuse, and why SafeGuard focuses on on-device detection and auto-SOS instead of 24/7 live maps.

共享定位真的比較安全嗎？
很多人以為「家人隨時看得到你在哪裡」就等於安心，但在親密關係暴力與家暴情境裡，位置共享反而可能變成監控與控制的工具。這篇文章從風險與真實案例出發，談共享定位的盲點，以及為什麼我選擇做「失能時自動求救」而不是 24 小時追蹤的系統。

This recent global Cloudflare outage is…

這次 Cloudflare 全球大當機，有一個很殘…

——從 NANA 事件談「不能自己求救時，怎麼…

— What NANA’s Case Tells Us About Autom…